About Us
What is the Christian Labor
Association?
- Bonafide trade union
- Cooperative and Mutual Respect
- Service
How is it different?
- We're a union not a church organization
- Were not associated with political organizations
- The CLA believes a strike is like an economic
declaration of war. The consequences are disastrous for everyone. There are no
winners in a war, only victims, and typically it's you the worker who is hurt
most. Sometimes it's inevitable, but a strike should always be used as a last
resort, after all other attempts at settlement have failed.
How was the CLA formed?
The CLA might sound like an upstart union, but
the fact is it's been around for a long time. Since 1931 to be exact. Immigrants
from Europe brought with them a different view of what labor relations should be
all about. They were appalled by what they saw here, a union movement that was
unabashedly hostile.
Knowing there was another way to do things, they established the Christian Labor
Association of the United States of America. The main difference between the new
union and the older established ones was philosophical. But it's a huge
important difference, one that all workers should be aware of.
The new union was based on Christian social principles of dignity and respect
for all people. The older unions came from a long established philosophy that
viewed owners and management as the enemy, foes of the working man to be fought
tooth and nail at every turn. The CLA's philosophy means pursuing, where
possible, a cooperative approach to labor-management relations.
Because of the philosophical differences, it's not surprising that the CLA met
with resistance from the established unions which felt threatened, if not
embarrassed, by this upstart. That mistrust continues to exist today,
particularly in the construction industry, where the CLA's progressive policies
stand in contrast to the restrictive practices of the AFL-CIO construction
unions.
The CLA's growth has been slow but steady as word gradually spread that there
was an alternative labor movement offering a cooperative approach to workplace
relations. Along the way, the established unions challenged and harassed the
fledgling union. Although initially viewed as a pesky thorn in their sides,
today the hard-line labor movement makes no bones about using its considerable
financial clout to try to create difficulties for the CLA at every opportunity.
But the CLA has continued to be not only a viable option for workers, but a
better option. |